Four Views of The Sick Rose :: sick

Four Views of The pallid bloom     Four Works Cited   By analyzing more in discrepancyation from different authors, I was able to reach a greater amount contrast from the authors.   I had a better feel for what they were trying to convey when they wrote their critical essays in their books.  Whatever the case, it was easier to judge The Sick Rose by having more sources to reflect upon.   Michael Riffaterre centers his analysis of The Sick Rose in The Self-sufficient Text by using internal evidence hardly to analyze the poem and to determine to what extent the literary text is self-sufficient. It seems to Riffaterre that a proper reading entails no more than a knowledge of the language (39). Riffaterre identifies psychological, philosophical, and genetic interpretations (connected to fabulous tradition) as aiming outwards. These approaches find the meaning of the text in the relationship of its images to other texts (40). Riffaterre argues fo r a more internal reading of the poems. Riffaterre emphasizes the importance of the relationships between run-in as opposed to their corresponding realities (40). For example, he states that the flower or the fruit is a variant of the worms dwelling constructed through destruction. Thus, as a word, worm is meaningful only in the context of flower, and flower only in the context of worm (41). After Riffaterres reading and interpretation of the poem, he concludes that The Sick Rose is collected of polarized polarities (44) which convey the central object of the poem, the actual phrase, the sick rose (44). He asserts that because the text provides all the elements necessary to our identifying these verbal artifacts, we do not have to apply to traditions or symbols found outside the text (44). Thus, The Sick Rose is a self-sufficient text.   Hazard Adams takes a different approach to reading The Sick Rose than most critics by cautioning the reader that often one overlooks the fac t that a literary image primarily imitates its previous usages and secondarily what it denotes in the outer dry land or in the realm of ideas (13). Adams begins his analysis with examining the rose, and by reminding the reader that in a literary world where the rose is seen archetypally, all things have human form (14). Thus he allows for the rose to be able to become part of the speaker. He carries his idea one step further by suggesting that the speaker forever and a day addresses some aspect of himself when speaking to an object.